| |
Precognition:
[1] [updated 15/04/2008] Tsunami, 2009 October, slightly north
of the Aceh earthquake zone. The city of Visakhapatnam,
east coast of India highlighted as an area that
will receive extensive damage.
[2] [updated Apr 25,2008] is the information - Japan - 20 11 (whether this is a time, date or year is not yet clear). The reason for adding it is that on Friday 18 Apr 2008 I was advised of a seismic event "Sea of Japan" , and the following day there was a seismic event in "The Sea of Japan". Although a very active seismic region, "Sea of Japan" is quite a specific location within the region.
[3] [updated Jan 04, 2009] . I suspect that a number of significant 'seismic' events may take place between 09 September and 10 October 2009. Possibility 4 events, in different locations. One of these events definitely seems to be in China, an event described as Tsunami, but then referred to as inland (this could be explained by a land slip).The GEOTIMES has published some articles about the geology of the region I suspect may be affected.
[n.b. From the little that I know at the moment I am NOT aware that Bay of Bengal will be one of the areas affected by major 'seismic' events in the short time frame referenced above.]
|
The diagram illustrates that there have been seven major earthquakes
in this area in 200 years. The Indian-Australian
plate (the light blue area) tries to slide
North, under the Eurasian plate (the dark
blue area) at about 60mm a year. The problem
is that due to friction it gets stuck
and pressure builds up until it ruptures.
Sumatra leapt 60 feet westward as a result
of the Dec 26 2004 earthquake.
From what I have read,
the scientific analysis of the Asian Tsunami
and my precognition seem to be at odds.
The odds would seem to be that the next
techtonic movement would be to the southeast
rather than slightly further to the North.
I just hope that the early warning stations
that are being built, and greater awareness
of the danger posed by Tsunami will help
to reduce the impact of future seismic
activity. |
 |
Dr. Kerry
Sieh - California Institute of Technology
"This
recent earthquake was generated by the seismic
rupture of only the northernmost portion of
the Sumatran section of the megathrust. Therefore,
the fact that most of the other part of the
section has generated few great earthquakes
in more than a hundred years is worrisome. Paleoseismic
research has shown that seismic ruptures like
the one in 1833, for example, recur about every
two centuries. Thus, other parts within the
section of this fault should be considered dangerous
over the next few decades."
The work of P. N. Nair, suggests that it may be possible to detect the magnetic field of Electrons emitted by techtonic friction, 10 days before an earthquake. www.earthquakewarning.org. The following paper discusses Earthquake prediction by animals.
|
|
